Every few years, a decision comes down against an insurance company for breach of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A that makes the plaintiffs’ personal injury bar chortle with glee and insurance defense attorneys wipe their brow and say, thank goodness that wasn’t my case. The recent Massachusetts Superior Court decision in Peerless Insurance Co. v. Rooney is one of those
Latest Post
More Posts
I'm moderating a webinar on insurance policy interpretation on Tuesday, January 22, 2026 at 1 PM; discount codes available
Massachusetts Lawyers: Want to Build a Career Litigating Insurance Bad Faith and Coverage Issues? Hit Me Up.
U.S. District Court holds that even after court judgment in underlying case, measure of 93A damages is lost interest — and my advice to both sides for handling 93A claims
Suffolk Superior Court applies continuous trigger and pro rata allocation to asbestos coverage dispute
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts finds coverage for water loss resulting from roof drain system, holding that policy itself creates ambiguity over the meaning of "drain"
Massachusetts Appeals Court gives sensible interpretation of contractual interest statute
Advice for people who are facing property losses in the Los Angeles fires: Hire a public adjuster
United States District Court for District of Massachusetts holds that insurer breached ch. 93A by denying fire coverage for new homeowner because she had not yet moved into her house
60 Minutes report on fraud by Florida homeowners insurers following Hurricane Ian two years ago
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org