On September 17, 2025, the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) will hold its first public meeting to discuss proposed rules designed to enhance transparency and preparedness around health care information system breaches. AHCA is Florida’s agency responsible for the state’s Medicaid program, the licensure of the state’s health care facilities, and the sharing of health care data through the Florida Center of Health Information and Policy Analysis.

The proposed rules would apply broadly to a wide range of licensed health care providers and facilities under AHCA’s regulatory authority. This includes, among others, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, ambulatory surgical centers, hospice providers, home health agencies, intermediate care facilities for individuals with developmental disabilities, clinical laboratories, rehabilitation centers, and health care clinics. In practice, nearly every licensed entity that delivers health care services in Florida or participates in Medicaid could be subject to the new obligations if approved.

Key Provisions

Mandatory Breach Reporting. Providers would be required to report “information technology incidents” to AHCA within 24 hours of having a reasonable belief that an incident may have occurred. For this purpose, an information technology incident means:   

an observable occurrence or data disruption or loss in an information technology system or network that permits or is caused by unauthorized access of data in electronic form. Good faith access by an authorized employee does not constitute an information technology incident, provided that the data is not used in an unauthorized manner or for an unauthorized purpose.

Notably the reporting obligation is not limited to an unauthorized access or acquisition of protected health information. Also, reports would need to be submitted through the Agency’s adverse incident reporting system using a standardized form. This short timeframe signals the Agency’s intent to receive timely information about potential breaches that could affect patient care or compromise sensitive health information.

Written Continuity Plans. Providers covered by the rule would need to maintain a written “continuity plan.” This plan is defined as a detailed policy that sets out procedures to maintain critical operations and essential patient care services during any disruption of normal operations.

Importantly, according to the proposed rules, continuity plans must not only have a process for performing redundant on-site and off-site data backups, but one that verifies the restorability of back-ups.  When facing a ransomware attack, for example, it is little help to have backed-up files, if the organization cannot restore them.

Additionally, the continuity plan must include procedures for restoring critical systems and patient services, and securely restoring backed-up data.

Post-Incident Documentation. Upon AHCA’s request, providers would be obligated to furnish documentation relating to an information technology incident. This could include police or forensic investigation reports, internal policies, details of the information disclosed, remedial measures taken, and the provider’s continuity plan. The rule is intended to ensure that providers not only respond to incidents but also demonstrate how they investigated, contained, and addressed them.

However, in many cases, some of these materials are prepared at the direction of counsel in anticipation of litigation and subject to the attorney client privilege. Providers concerned about the disclosure of such materials, which could include confidential business and proprietary information, as well as sensitive information about the organization’s IT infrastructure, should consult with counsel.

Next Steps

If adopted, the proposed rule would impose significant operational and compliance requirements on Florida’s licensed health care providers. Facilities and organizations subject to AHCA licensure should review their current cybersecurity incident response procedures, reporting mechanisms, and continuity planning to ensure they align with the proposed requirements, if adopted.

Photo of Joseph J. Lazzarotti Joseph J. Lazzarotti

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP)…

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) with the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Trained as an employee benefits lawyer, focused on compliance, Joe also is a member of the firm’s Employee Benefits practice group.

In short, his practice focuses on the matrix of laws governing the privacy, security, and management of data, as well as the impact and regulation of social media. He also counsels companies on compliance, fiduciary, taxation, and administrative matters with respect to employee benefit plans.

Privacy and cybersecurity experience – Joe counsels multinational, national and regional companies in all industries on the broad array of laws, regulations, best practices, and preventive safeguards. The following are examples of areas of focus in his practice:

  • Advising health care providers, business associates, and group health plan sponsors concerning HIPAA/HITECH compliance, including risk assessments, policies and procedures, incident response plan development, vendor assessment and management programs, and training.
  • Coached hundreds of companies through the investigation, remediation, notification, and overall response to data breaches of all kinds – PHI, PII, payment card, etc.
  • Helping organizations address questions about the application, implementation, and overall compliance with European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and, in particular, its implications in the U.S., together with preparing for the California Consumer Privacy Act.
  • Working with organizations to develop and implement video, audio, and data-driven monitoring and surveillance programs. For instance, in the transportation and related industries, Joe has worked with numerous clients on fleet management programs involving the use of telematics, dash-cams, event data recorders (EDR), and related technologies. He also has advised many clients in the use of biometrics including with regard to consent, data security, and retention issues under BIPA and other laws.
  • Assisting clients with growing state data security mandates to safeguard personal information, including steering clients through detailed risk assessments and converting those assessments into practical “best practice” risk management solutions, including written information security programs (WISPs). Related work includes compliance advice concerning FTC Act, Regulation S-P, GLBA, and New York Reg. 500.
  • Advising clients about best practices for electronic communications, including in social media, as well as when communicating under a “bring your own device” (BYOD) or “company owned personally enabled device” (COPE) environment.
  • Conducting various levels of privacy and data security training for executives and employees
  • Supports organizations through mergers, acquisitions, and reorganizations with regard to the handling of employee and customer data, and the safeguarding of that data during the transaction.
  • Representing organizations in matters involving inquiries into privacy and data security compliance before federal and state agencies including the HHS Office of Civil Rights, Federal Trade Commission, and various state Attorneys General.

Benefits counseling experience – Joe’s work in the benefits counseling area covers many areas of employee benefits law. Below are some examples of that work:

  • As part of the Firm’s Health Care Reform Team, he advises employers and plan sponsors regarding the establishment, administration and operation of fully insured and self-funded health and welfare plans to comply with ERISA, IRC, ACA/PPACA, HIPAA, COBRA, ADA, GINA, and other related laws.
  • Guiding clients through the selection of plan service providers, along with negotiating service agreements with vendors to address plan compliance and operations, while leveraging data security experience to ensure plan data is safeguarded.
  • Counsels plan sponsors on day-to-day compliance and administrative issues affecting plans.
  • Assists in the design and drafting of benefit plan documents, including severance and fringe benefit plans.
  • Advises plan sponsors concerning employee benefit plan operation, administration and correcting errors in operation.

Joe speaks and writes regularly on current employee benefits and data privacy and cybersecurity topics and his work has been published in leading business and legal journals and media outlets, such as The Washington Post, Inside Counsel, Bloomberg, The National Law Journal, Financial Times, Business Insurance, HR Magazine and NPR, as well as the ABA Journal, The American Lawyer, Law360, Bender’s Labor and Employment Bulletin, the Australian Privacy Law Bulletin and the Privacy, and Data Security Law Journal.

Joe served as a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Laura Denvir Stith on the Missouri Court of Appeals.