For some time now, merger-objection and acquisition-objection litigation against buyers of companies have been on the rise. In years past, these cases often settled for not much more than additional-disclosure agreements and reimbursement of plaintiffs’ attorney fees. Some settlements, however, have involved substantial financial payments to the acquisition- and/or merger-objecting plaintiffs to resolve their inadequate-consideration, also known as “bump up,&rdquo
Latest Post
More Posts
Insurance Webinar Series: Insurance Applications: Best Practices and the Consequences of Missteps
A Roadmap to Insurance Coverage for the Mother of Toxic Torts: PFAS
“Take-Home COVID” Claims May Lead to Future Insurance Disputes
An Alaska Court Goes Fishing for Insurance, Hooking Another Policyholder Win in a Phishing Scam Case
New Decisions Question the Boundaries of Fortuity under California Law
Livin’ on a Prayer (for Noneconomic Damages in a Coverage Dispute)
Update: Ninth Circuit Affirms Enforcement of China Venue Clause
Insurance Webinar Series: Panic! at the Firewall: Cyber Incident Response and the Role of Insurance
Understanding Insurance Terms in Construction Contracts
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org